High CourtsDivision Bench

Ganesh Dhakal vs State Of Sikkim

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 15 May 2023 · Citation: (2023) 05 SIK CK 0033

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J · Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 14 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 110 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Mr. S. K. Chettri, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State-Respondent verbally seeks time to take steps for filing a Petition for enhancement of Sentence. It is submitted that he has already sent necessary correspondence to the Police Department who are yet instruct him in the matter.

Considering, that a month has elapsed since the last Order of this Court, we grant the prayer for time to the State-Respondent, subject to payment of costs of ₹ 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand) only, to be paid by State-Respondent to the Sikkim State Legal Services Authority for utilisation in the ‘One Stop Centre’, at Lumsey, Gangtok.

List on 31-05-2023.