AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 198 wordsSatyen Vaidya, J
Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents-State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court on 07.11.2012, in CWP No. 4954 of 2012 alongwith connected matters, titled Madan Lal and Ors. Vs. State of H.P. and Ors. He further submits that the petitioner shall be content in case the respondents are directed to consider the case in light of aforesaid judgment in time bound manner.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No. 2 to consider the case of the petitioner within six weeks from today in light of judgment passed in CWP No. 4954 of 2012 alongwith connected matters and decide the same by passing a speaking order. Needless to say, in case the petitioner is found entitled to the same relief(s) as granted to the petitioners in CWP No. 4954 of 2012, the same and identical relief will be granted to the petitioner within the aforesaid period.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
