AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 218 wordsSatyen Vaidya, J
Notice. Mr. Rahul Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents-State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 842 of 2017 alongwith connected matter, decided on 07.07.2022, titled as State of H,P. and Others Vs. Sardari Lal and Ors. He further submits that petitioner shall be content in case the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner in a time bound manner in light of judgment ibid.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No. 2 to consider the case of the petitioner in light of judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 842 of 2017 alongwith connected matter, decided on 07.07.2022, titled as State of H,P. and Others Vs. Sardari Lal and Ors., within eight weeks from today and will decide the same by passing a speaking order. In case, the petitioner is found similarly situated as respondents in CWP No. 842 of 2017, he will also be granted the same benefits as granted to the respondents in above case.
Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
