Gopal Singh vs State And Ors

Heard learned counsel the petitioner and the learned P.P.

Perused the material on record.

The instant miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking direction for conducting fair investigation in F.I.R. No.8/2016 registered at

Police Station Barmer (Rural), District Barmer.

The petitioner filed an F.I.R. No. 8/2016 at the Police Station Barmer (Rural), District Barmer against the accused person named in the F.I.R. for the

offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 191, 192 and 193 I.P.C. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the police authorities have not

taken any action against the accused person and thus appropriate direction be given for fair investigation of the F.I.R.

This Court is of the opinion that in view of the observations made and directions given by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State

of U.P., AIR 2008 SC 907, no person can be encouraged to directly approach this Court for seeking direction of fair investigation. If any person is

aggrieved of lack of action by the police as regards the FIR which has been filed by/against him/her, the appropriate course of action for the aggrieved

person is to first approach the Magistrate having jurisdiction, who can call for the report from the investigating officer and also instruct the

investigating officer to investigate the matter fairly. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any inaction of the police, then he should move to the appropriate

Court in accordance with the directions issued by the Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment. The trial court would be empowered to call for the report

from the I.O. and issue appropriate direction for fair investigation in consonance with the view expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court.

With the aforesaid observations, the miscellaneous petition and the stay petition are disposed of.