High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Pramsukh S/o Shri Devkishan vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 21 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 RAJ CK 0060

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
<a href=1767>Indian Penal Code, 1860</a>, <a href=1767-s 302>Sections 302</a>
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
3925 of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

30 paragraphs · 288 words
1.

Heard learned counsel the petitioner and the learned P.P.

Perused the material on record.

2.

The instant miscellaneous petition has been filed by the

petitioner seeking direction for conducting fair investigation in

F.I.R. No.101/2015 registered at P.S. Kolayat.

3.

The petitioner filed an F.I.R. No. 101/2015 at the P.S. Kolayat

against the accused named in the F.I.R. for the offences under

Sections 302 I.P.C. According to the learned counsel for the

petitioner, the police authorities have not taken any action against

the accused and thus appropriate direction be given for fair

investigation of the F.I.R.

4.

This Court is of the opinion that in view of the observations

made and directions given by the Hon''ble Apex Court in the case

of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P., AIR 2008 SC 907, no person

can be encouraged to directly approach this Court for seeking

direction of fair investigation. If any person is aggrieved of lack of

action by the police as regards the FIR which has been filed

by/against him/her, the appropriate course of action for the

aggrieved person is to first approach the Magistrate having

jurisdiction, who can call for the report from the investigating

officer and also instruct the investigating officer to investigate the

matter fairly. If the petitioner is aggrieved by any inaction of the

police, then he should move to the appropriate Court in

accordance with the directions issued by the Apex Court in the

aforesaid judgment. The trial court would be empowered to call for

the report from the I.O. and issue appropriate direction for fair

investigation in consonance with the view expressed by the

Hon''ble Apex Court.

5.

With the aforesaid observations, the miscellaneous petition

and the stay petition are disposed of.