High CourtsSingle Bench

Govind Baghel vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 20 March 2020 · Citation: (2020) 03 CHH CK 0036

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 147, 148, 149, 307, 396, 397, 404, 436, 449 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25, 27 · Explosive Substances Act 1883 — Section 3, 5
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 960 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 215 words

@JUDGMENT-JUDGMENT

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J

1.

Heard.

2.

This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.14/2010, registered at Police Station Kuwakonda, District Dantewada, for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 396, 397, 307, 404, 436, 449, 120 (B) of IPC, Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3 & 5 of the Explosive Substances Act.

3.

The applicant along with other accused persons entered the MCRC No. 960 of 2020 house of one Political Activist Awadhesh Gautam during the intervening night of 7th and 8th of July 2010 and opened fire at about 12: 50 AM. Two persons namely Sanjay and Dharmendra, brother-in-law and servant of Awadhesh Gautam, were murdered in the incident, whereas, Awadhesh Gautam's son suffered gun shot injuries over his leg. About 100-150 naxalites encircled and surrounded the house of the complainant.

4.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

5.

Considering the nature of allegations and for the fact that the applicant is named in the FIR, I am of the opinion that present is not a fit case to release the applicant on regular bail.

6.

The application is dismissed.