High CourtsSingle Bench

Gunanand Bijalwan vs Ajay Chauhan

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 27 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0410

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 58 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 132 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Writ Court had directed the opposite party to calculate and pay the gratuity to the petitioner for the services, he rendered between 16.05.1975 till

31.12.2004 along with interest @ 12 percent per annum.

2.

In this contempt petition, it is alleged that the order passed by Writ Court has not been complied with.

3.

A compliance affidavit has been filed by Mr. Ajay Chauhan, Managing Director, Uttar Pradesh Co-Operative Federation Ltd., 32 Station Road,

Lucknow. In para 9 of the said affidavit, it has been stated that such amount of gratuity has been paid to the petitioner.

4.

In such view of the matter, nothing survives in the present contempt petition.

5.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. Notice issued to the opposite party is hereby discharged.