High CourtsSingle Bench

Heera Singh vs B.R. Tamta

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 8 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 UK CK 0127

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 150 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 116 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Writ Court had directed the respondents to make payment of gratuity to the petitioner on the basis of his last drawn salary.

2.

A compliance affidavit has been filed by Mr. B.R. Tamta, Executive Engineer, National Highways Division, Ranikhet, District Almora. In paragraph no. 3 of the said affidavit, it has been stated that the amount of gratuity calculated on the basis of last drawn salary of the petitioner, has been paid in the year 2017.

3.

In such view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing survives in this Contempt Petition.

4.

Accordingly, Contempt Petition is closed. Contempt notice issued to respondent is hereby discharged.