High CourtsSingle Bench

Gurbachan Singh vs State Of Haryana And Ors

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 October 2025 · Citation: (2025) 10 P&H CK 1432

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jagmohan Bansal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 226, 227
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 95 Of 2003(O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 117 words

Jagmohan Bansal, J

1.

The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 17.04.2000 dated (Annexure P-65) whereby he was compulsorily retired.

2.

The petitioner joined Haryana Police Force as Constable on 20.12.1971. On account of adverse reports, he was compulsorily retired by impugned order. He had completed 25 years qualifying service by the date of passing of impugned order.

3.

It appears that with the efflux of time, petitioner has lost interest to pursue the present petition.

4.

Disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives.

5.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.