High CourtsSingle Bench

Gurjeet Singh vs Jitender Verma And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0286

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Kumar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10561 Of CII Of 2020 In First Appeal Order No. 3825 Of 2014
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 249 words

Sanjay Kumar, J

This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, was filed by the claimant in MACT Case No.28 of 2013 seeking enhancement of the

compensation awarded to him in relation to the injuries suffered by him in a motor accident. The appellant was granted a sum of Rs. 27,500/-, VIDE

Award dated 11.10.2013.

While so, an application in CM-10561-CII-2020 was filed jointly by the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for Reliance General

Insurance Company Limited, the third respondent, seeking advancement of the hearing of the case and its disposal in terms of the compromise arrived

at by and between them.

The application is ordered and the appeal is taken up for hearing today itself.

In terms of the compromise arrived at by and between the parties, the third respondent-Insurance Company is willing to pay a further sum of Rs.

 50,000/- over and above the amount already awarded in full and final settlement of the appellant's claim for enhanced compensation. Mr. R.S.

Budhwar, learned counsel for the appellant, affirms that his client is willing to accept the offer in full settlement of his claim.

In the light of the aforestated compromise and the joint application filed by the parties, this appeal is allowed directing the third respondent-Insurance

Company to pay a sum of Rs. Â 50,000/- by way of cheque drawn in the name of the appellant within four weeks, under due and proper

acknowledgment.

No order as to costs.