High CourtsSingle Bench

Harjinder Singh @ Soni vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 10 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 P&H CK 0115

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Shekhar Attri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 22, 29
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous (M) No.41060 of 2018(O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 296 words

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail pending trial in case FIR No.98 dated 04.08.2018

registered under Sections 22 and 29 (added later on) of NDPS Act 1985, at Police Station Doraha, District Khanna.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has unnecessarily been involved in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the

petitioner. The name of the petitioner has been involved by the police only on the statement of the co-accused Balkar Singh; who is alleged to have

stated to the police that he was to sell the drugs recovered from him to the present petitioner. It is contended by the counsel that since the alleged

substance had not even reached the petitioner, therefore, no offence under NDPS Act can be alleged against the petitioner, even if the entire

allegation are taken to be correct.

On the other hand, learned State counsel, being instructed by HC Harnake Singh, submits that the petitioner has been named by the co- accused as

the possible recipient of the material recovered from the co-accused, therefore, he has rightly been involved in the case. It is further pointed out that

there has been another case against the petitioner in which he was convicted.

In response to this, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in that case, the petitioner was sentenced only for imprisonment already undergone

by the present petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner is not involved in any other case except the present one.

In view of the above, but without commenting any further upon merits of the case, the present petition is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner be

released on bail on his furnishing bail bonds/ sureties to the satisfaction of the trial Court.