AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 251 wordsJASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL)
34 Petitioners herein were engaged as Special Police Officers (SPOs) i.e. Class-IV employees on Daily Wage basis during the period from 1990 to
1996 i.e. prior to 2004 by the Punjab Police. The services of all of them have been regularized during the period 2004 to 2010, therefore, they are
sought to be governed under the new restructured defined Contributory Pension Scheme introduced for the appointees after 01.01.2004. The prayer
of the petitioners is for a direction that they be governed under the old pension scheme applicable to the appointees prior to 01.01.2004 by counting
their previous periods of engagement with the Punjab Armed Police.
It is contended that the issue is squarely covered by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court rendered in Harbans Lal Vs. The State of Punjab
& Ors. 2012(3) S.C.T. 362 which has attained finality.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab who is present in Court accepts notice and on instructions from
Mr. Rajesh Chopra, Court Clerk, O/o ADGP Armed Batallion, Jalandhar concedes that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the ratio of
Harbans Lal's case (supra) and after counting of their previous total periods of engagement, they are to be considered as appointees prior to
01.01.2004 and, therefore, governed under the old pension scheme.
In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in Harbans Lal's case (supra).
