AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 236 wordsJASWANT SINGH, J.(ORAL)
Petitioner herein was engaged as Special Police Officer (SPO) i.e. Class-IV employee on Daily Wage basis during the year 1993 by the Punjab
Police. His services were regularized in the year 2005, therefore, he is sought to be governed under the new restructured defined Contributory
Pension Scheme introduced for the appointees after 01.01.2004. The prayer of the petitioner is for a direction that he be governed under the old
pension scheme applicable to the appointees prior to 01.01.2004 by counting his previous periods of engagement with the Punjab Armed Police.
It is contended that the issue is squarely covered by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court rendered in Harbans Lal Vs. The State of Punjab
& Ors. 2012(3) S.C.T. 362 which has attained finality.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court, Mr. Manoj Bajaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab who is present in Court accepts notice and on instructions from
Mr. Rajesh Chopra, Court Clerk, O/o ADGP Armed Batallion, Jalandhar concedes that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the ratio of
Harbans Lal's case (supra) and after counting of his previous total periods of engagement, he is to be considered as appointee prior to 01.01.2004
and, therefore, governed under the old pension scheme.
In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as in Harbans Lal's case (supra).
