AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
2 paragraphs · 143 wordsA letter has been circulated and filed by the Learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 that they seek discharge from this matter as the counsel for Respondent No.1. The prayer is allowed. Mr. Sumit Rawat appears on behalf of Respondent No.1 and prays that they be granted one week's time for filing fresh Vakalatnama in the matter on behalf of Respondent No.1 and further two weeks time for filing evidences on behalf of Respondent No.1.
The prayer was strongly opposed on behalf of the Petitioner and it was submitted that time has been allowed to the Respondents from 05.01.2022. The time as prayed on behalf of Respondent No.1 is allowed. The evidences subsequent to the time allowed today shall be accepted subject to cost of Rs.5000/- payable to the TDSAT Employees Welfare Society. Let the matter be listed on 7th July, 2022 for directions.
