High Courts

Head Constable Des Raj vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 24 October 1985 · Citation: (1985) 10 P&H CK 0025

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.S.Dewan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5593-M of 1985
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 92 words

S.S. Dewan, J.

1.

Mr. Manmohan Singh, Advocate, appearing for the State says that the petitioner is always available to the police as and when require by them for investigation purposes. In the circumstances, the petitioner is allowed anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. He is, however, directed to joint the investigation as and when required by the police. He is further directed not to tamper with the prosecution evidence and not to leave India without the prior permission of Illaqa Magistrate concerned.