High CourtsSingle Bench

Heeraman Kosre vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 17 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0143

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354D, 509, 509B · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2480 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 365 words

Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J

1.

Heard on the application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. This is first bail application before this Court filed by the applicant for grant of

regular bail. The applicant has been arrested on 04-03-2021 in connection with Crime No.92/2021 registered at P.S. - Khairagarh, District

Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh for the offence under Section 354 D, 509, 509B of the IPC.

2.

It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in jail since 04-03-2021. All the allegations

made by the complainant are totally false. Charge sheet has been filed. Therefore, it is prayed that the applicant may be granted bail.

3.

Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the application submitting that the complainant in this case has made clear allegation against

this applicant looking to which he is not entitled for grant of bail.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents.

5.

According to the prosecution case, the complainant had some dispute with her husband. This applicant approached the complainant to help her for

resolving the dispute. It was during this period this applicant made undue advances towards the complainant, by sending her messages regarding which

the complainant had objection. On one occasion the applicant and the complainant both had been to Bilaspur for engaging counsel, subsequent to

which it is alleged by the complainant, that the applicant has floated rumors and made defamatory statement in public to show that he and the

complainant have some kind of relationship. Hence, the FIR has been lodged.

6.

Considered on the submissions. As the investigation in this case is complete and the case is pending for trial, therefore, I feel inclined to allow this

application.

7.

Consequently, this application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail is hereby allowed. It is directed that

the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of

the concerned Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

8.

Certified copy as per rules.