High CourtsSingle Bench

Kartik Shankar Markam vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 17 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0122

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 294, 323, 345, 354, 394, 395 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2464 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 350 words

Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J

1.

Heard on the application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. This is first bail application before this Court filed by the applicant for grant of

regular bail. The applicant has been arrested on 27-01-2021 in connection with Crime No.11/2021 registered at P.S. - Lakhanpur, District Surguja,

Chhattisgarh for the offence under Section 294, 323, 354, 394, 395, 345 of the IPC.

2.

It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The FIR and the statement of the victim does not

mention regarding commission of any offence by this applicant. Therefore, there is no case against him. He is in jail since 27-01-2021. Hence, it is

prayed that the applicant may be granted bail.

3.

Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the application submitting that looking to the presence of diary statement against this applicant,

he is no entitlement for grant of bail.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents.

5.

According to the prosecution case, on the date of incident the prosecutrix had been to a chhatti ceremony with her husband, where her husband had

some argument with other co-accused persons and he was beaten by them. In the later event modesty of the victim was outraged by co- accused

persons. The allegation against this applicant is this, that he was present at the time of incident and he had also put his hand inside the coat pocket of

the prosecutrix.

6.

After considering on the submissions and the facts present in this case, I am of this view that the applicant is entitled for grant of bail.

7.

Consequently, this application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail is hereby allowed. It is directed that

the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of

the concerned Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

8.

Certified copy as per rules.