High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 02 RAJ CK 0039

Hemant Kapoor S/o Late B.L. Kapoor vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 6 February 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
1176 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 298 words
1.

This application for anticipatory bail under sec.438 CrPC has

been filed in connection with FIR No.539/2016, Police Station-

Pratap Nagar, District Bhilwara, for offences punishable under

sections 406, 417, 420 IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was

lodged on account of a business transaction, the matter does not

travel beyond civil nature and so far as the money transaction is

concerned, the petitioner has already returned back the money for

the clothes. On the other hand, there are security cheques which

are with the complainant. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the

bail application.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor.

4.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the matter,

without commenting on the merits of this case, I deem it just and

proper to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-

applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

5.

Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed

that in the event of arrest of accused-applicant in connection with

FIR No.539/2016, Police Station, Pratap Nagar, District Bhilwara

the accused-applicant - Hemant Kapoor s/o late Mr B.L. Kapoor

aforesaid shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a

personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties

in the sum of Rs.25000/- each, to the satisfaction of the

concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions:

(1) He shall make himself available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required;

(2) He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(3) He shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial court.