AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
27 paragraphs · 297 wordsThis application for anticipatory bail under sec.438 CrPC has
been filed in connection with FIR No.799/2016, Police Station-
Pratap Nagar, District Bhilwara, for offences punishable under
sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the matter on
the basis of which the FIR has been lodged is essentially a civil
dispute arising out of a business transaction between the parties.
As per information stated by the Public Prosecutor in that case a
Final Report has been made that it is a civil dispute.
Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicants as well as
learned Public Prosecutor.
Having considered the circumstances of the matter, without
commenting on the merits of this case, I deem it just and proper
to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-applicants
under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of accused-applicants in connection with
FIR No.799/2016, Police Station, Pratap Nagar, District Bhilwara
the accused-applicant - 1) Mannu Khan s/o Mohd Mustafa Khan
and 2) Rajendra Mundra s/o Ramswaroop Munda aforesaid shall
be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the
sum of Rs.50,000/- each, along with two sureties in the sum of
Rs.25000/- each, to the satisfaction of the concerned
Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions:
(1) They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required;
(2) They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
(3) They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial court.
