High CourtsSingle Bench

Himanshu Kashyap @ Jassi & Others vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 January 2023 · Citation: (2023) 01 UK CK 0104

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 341, 504, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2005, 1873, 2004 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 176 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Since, all the above bail applications arise from the same FIR, these are being decided together by this common judgment.

2.

Applicants Himanshu Kashyap @ Jassi, Sanjay Chauhan and Vivek Pargai are in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.195 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 341, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar. They have sought their release on bail.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

4.

It is argued that the co-accused having similar role have already been granted bail.

4.

This fact is not disputed by the learned State counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail applications are allowed.

7.

Let the applicants be released on bail, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties by each one of them, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.