High CourtsSingle Bench

Ijay Kumar @ Baba And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0280

HON’BLE JUDGES
Archana Puri, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 148, 149, 323, 324
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 43669, 43735 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 453 words

Archana Puri, J

The matter has been taken up through video conferencing in the light of COVID-19 pandemic.

CRM-M-43669-2020

The petitioners have invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court by way of filing this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., thereby making prayer for

quashing of FIR No.51 dated 13.06.2019 under sections 324, 323, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Dhariwal, District

Gurdaspur, and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of arrival of compromise between the parties. Likewise, even cross-

version was setup in the aforesaid FIR at the instance of Gurmeet Singh.

CRM-M-43735-2020

The petitioners have invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court by way of filing this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., thereby making prayer for

quashing of cross case, so set up at the instance of Gurmeet Singh, who has been arrayed as respondent No.2 in this petition.

On 23.12.2020, notice of motion was issued in both the petitions and parties were directed to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Court/Duty

Magistrate and get their statements recorded with regard to arrival of compromise between them. The Trial Court was directed to record the

statements of all the concerned and send the report regarding genuineness of the compromise.

In consonance with the order dated 23.12.2020 passed in both the petitions, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurdaspur, has recorded the statements

of the parties vis-a-vis arrival of compromise dated 06.07.2020. Even, statement of the Investigating Officer has been recorded and on the basis of the

statements so got recorded, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurdaspur reached at the conclusion that the compromise dated 06.07.2020 (Annexure

P-3) is genuine, voluntary, without any coercion or undue influence working on the minds of the parties.

The parties are residents of same village and thus arrival of the compromise shall remove the bitterness existing between them, on account of initiation

of the criminal proceedings against each other and shall give quietus to the dispute between them.

In view of the same, the continuation of the criminal proceedings would be futile exercise resulting in sheer abuse of the process of law.

To so conclude, reliance is placed upon “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and anotherâ€, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 u,pheld by

Hon'ble Apex Court in “Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and othersâ€​, (2012) 10 SCC 303.

Considering the aforesaid fact situation of both the cases, coupled with the reasons aforementioned and to secure the ends of justice, FIR No.51 dated

13.06.2019 under sections 324, 323, 148, 149 of Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Dhariwal, District Gurdaspur, cross-case registered in

the ibid FIR and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are ordered to be quashed.

Accordingly, the present petition stands allowed.