High CourtsSingle Bench

Paramjit Kaur And Others vs State Of Punjab And Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hari Pal Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 148, 149, 323, 324, 326
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 38764 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

38 paragraphs · 780 words

Hari Pal Verma, J

The matter has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing due to outbreak of COVID-19.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.101 dated 15.10.2020 under Sections 324, 323, 148

and 149 IPC (Section 326 IPC was added later on) registered at Police Station Purana Shalla, District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent

proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 04.11.2020 (Annexure P-2).

This Court vide order dated 24.11.2020 had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/trial Court to get their

respective statements recorded with regard to compromise and the Court was directed to send its report qua genuineness of the compromise.

Pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 24.11.2020 passed by this Court, the petitioners as well as respondent No.2-complainant Kawaldeep Singh had

appeared before learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurdaspur and got their statements recorded on 15.12.2020. On the basis of the statements so

recorded by the parties, learned Magistrate has submitted the report dated 18.12.2020 with regard to the compromise effected between the parties to

the effect that the compromise is genuine one, because both the parties have assembled in the Court and have made statements voluntarily.

The FIR in question has been recorded on the basis of statement of respondent No.2-complainant Kawaldeep Singh. He has already made a

statement before learned Magistrate in support of the compromise on 15.12.2020, which reads as under:

“Stated that with the intervention of respectables I have entered into compromise with the petitioners/accused persons namely Paramjit Kaur wife

of Kawaldeep Singh, Harjinder Singh @ Pappu son of Jaswant Singh, Sandeep Singh @ Tibri son of Harwinder Singh, Sharanjit Kaur wife of

Harwinder Singh, Jagdeep Singh @ Jaggi son of Harjinder Singh, all residents of Village Jagatpur Kalan, Tehsil and District Gurdaspur and Mandeep

Kaur daughter of Harwinder Singh resident of village Harchowal, Tehsil Batala, District Gurdaspur, in FIR No.101 dated 15.10.2020 under Section

324, 323, 148,l 149 IPC (326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Purana Shalla, District Gurdaspur which was got registered by

victim/complainant/first informant Kawaldeep Singh against accused persons/petitioners at Police Station Purana Shalla. The petition for quashing of

present FIR No.101 dated 15.10.2020 under Section 324, 323, 148,l 149 IPC (326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Purana Shalla,

District Gurdaspur has been filed by accused persons in the Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh and vide order dated

24.11.2020 in CRM-M No.38764 of 2020, the parties have been directed to record statements before this learned Court. The compromise effected by

us is genuine and without any pressure, coercion and undue influence and I have compromised with my own sweet will. It is further stated no other

criminal proceeding is pending between us and accused persons. I have no objection if the FIR No.101 dated 15.10.2020 under Section 324, 323, 148,l

149 IPC (326 IPC added later on) registered at Police Station Purana Shalla, District Gurdaspur is quashed against the accused persons namely

Paramjit Kaur wife of Kawaldeep Singh, Harjinder Singh @ Pappu son of Jaswant Singh, Sandeep Singh @ Tibri son of Harwinder Singh, Sharanjit

Kaur wife of Harwinder Singh, Jagdeep Singh @ Jaggi son of Harjinder Singh, all residents of Village Jagatpur Kalan, Tehsil and District Gurdaspur

and Mandeep Kaur daughter of Harwinder Singh resident of village Harchowal, Tehsil Batala, District Gurdaspur. I have placed on record copy of my

Aadhar Card Ex.C1 as my identity proof.â€​

In view of the above, this Court finds that there is no impediment in quashing of the FIR in question qua the petitioners. In fact, continuation of the

proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR qua the petitioners shall be an abuse of the process of law.

Thus, following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another

2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, the

present petition is allowed and the FIR No.101 dated 15.10.2020 under Sections 324, 323, 148 and 149 IPC (Section 326 IPC was added later on)

registered at Police Station Purana Shalla, District Gurdaspur (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the

petitioners on the basis of compromise dated 04.11.2020 (Annexure P-2).

Since the present order is being passed in the absence of respective lawyers of the parties, in case either party finds that any prejudice has been

caused to them, they shall be at liberty to seek revival of the present petition.