High CourtsSingle Bench

Indira Devi vs R.K. Sudhansu

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 21 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 UK CK 0262

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 251 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 164 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This Contempt Petition has been filed for enforcement of an interim order dated 10.01.2018 passed in WPSS No. 31 of 2018.

2.

Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the opposite party has produced in Court the final judgment rendered in the said writ petition.

3.

A counter affidavit has been filed by Mr. R.K. Sudhanshu, Secretary, Urban Development Department, Dehradun. In para 5 of the said affidavit, it has been stated that a sum of ₹7,58,476/- was paid to the petitioner as arrear of pension besides ₹1,65,171/- as gratuity. In para 6 of the said affidavit, it has been stated that arrears of Family Pension, amounting to ₹13,000/-, was also paid to the petitioner.

4.

In view of the statement made in the said counter affidavit, this Court is satisfied that compliance of the order passed by Writ Court has been made.

5.

Accordingly, contempt petition is closed. Notice issued to the opposite party is hereby discharged.