High CourtsSingle Bench

Jayanti Devi vs Arvind Kumar

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 13 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0211

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 435 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 100 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Mr. Gopal K. Verma, learned Addl. C.S.C. appearing for opposite party submits that the order dated 23.03.2017 passed by Writ Court in Writ

Petition (S/S) No. 1894 of 2013 has been complied with and the family pension admissible to the petitioner, with interest, has been released.

2.

Mr. Tribunwan Chandra Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner also endorses the said statement made by Mr. Gopal K. Verma,

learned Addl. C.S.C. for the opposite party.

3.

In such view of the matter, Contempt Petition is closed. Contempt notice issued to opposite party is hereby discharged.