AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 131 wordsHon''ble Sudhanshu, J.—Heard Mr. Anoop Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner and Mr. Dinesh Gahtori, Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. An affidavit of compliance has been filed by the learned Standing counsel stating that the order dated 1st August, 2011 passed in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 219 of 2011, which were alleged to have been violated by the respondent, have been complied with subsequent to the filing of the contempt petition.
This fact has been admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anoop Verma and he states that the order dated 1st August, 2011 has been complied with.
In view of the above affidavit and the statement given by the learned counsel for the petitioner in Court, the contempt petition is dismissed. Notices are also discharged.
