High CourtsSingle Bench

Ishdat Tiwari and Another vs Tameshwar Tiwari and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 20 March 1923 · Citation: (1923) ILR (All) 537

HON’BLE JUDGES
Piggott, J
RESULT
Allowed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 125 words

Piggott, J.—I have considered the office report and the arguments of counsel. The cross-objections are admittedly liable to an ad valorem fee on the subject matter in dispute. This can only be ascertained by an examination of the decrees passed by the courts below. The first court dismissed the plaintiffs'' suit: the lower appellate court gave the plaintiff Ishdat a decree "ba qadr jaedad maliyat mubligh Rs. 100-10-0." The defendants in their petition of cross-objections ask for the restoration of the first court''s decree. I hold that the value of the subject matter in dispute on their petition of cross-objections is Rs. 100-10-0: they must pay an ad valorem fee on this amount. I allow them one month within which to make good the deficiency.