High CourtsSingle Bench

Ishdatt Tewari and Another vs Tameshar Tewari and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 20 March 1923 · Citation: AIR 1924 All 175 : 83 Ind. Cas. 780

HON’BLE JUDGES
Piggott, J
RESULT
Allowed
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 123 words

Piggott, J.—I have considered the Office Report and the arguments of Counsel. The cross-objections are admittedly liable to an ad valorem fee on the subject-matter in dispute This can only be ascertained by an examination of the decrees passed by the Courts below the First Court dismissed the plaintiff''s suit: the lower Appellate Court gave the plaintiff Ishdatt a decree be qadr jaedad maliyat mubligh Rs. 100-10". The defendants, in their petition of cross-objections, ask for the restoration of the First Court''s decree. I hold that the value of the subject-matter in dispute on their petition of cross-objections is Rs. 100-10: they must pay an ad valorem fee on this amount. I allow them one month within which to make good the deficiency.