High CourtsSingle Bench

Jaffar Ansari vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 3 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 JH CK 0024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 392, 414
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 9155 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 363 words

Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the

stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jagannathpur P.S. Case No.228 of 2020 registered under sections 392/414/34

of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery of gold chain of the

informant and that he has been identified in T.I. Parade. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner

has been falsely implicated in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 18.06.2020 as has been mentioned in

paragraph no. 1 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to pay Rs. 60,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the

informant without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case.

Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to

enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on depositing a demand draft of Rs.60,000/- in

favour of informant and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Jagannathpur P.S. Case No.228 of 2020 with the condition that he will cooperate

with the trial of the case.

In case, the petitioner deposits the ad interim victim compensation amount, the court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and hand over

the said demand draft to her, after proper identification.