High CourtsSingle Bench

Jamuna Prashad vs Radhika Jha & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 4 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 UK CK 0008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 365, 366, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 161 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Learned Chief Standing Counsel submits that Secretary, School Education has passed an order on 29.10.2021, whereby the concerned authorities

were directed to comply with the order passed by Writ Court. He further submits that, pursuant to order passed by Secretary, part payment of the

monetary dues of the petitioner has been released and the remaining dues would be cleared, within two weeks.

2.

Mr. R.C. Arya, Chief Education Officer, Udham Singh Nagar is also present in Court today, who apprised the Court that arrears of salary from the

year 2006 has already been released to the petitioner and the remaining arrears would be paid positively within two weeks.

3.

In view of the assurance given on behalf of respondents, the contempt petitions are closed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby

discharged. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to seek recall of this order, if the assurance given on behalf of respondents is not honoured.