High CourtsSingle Bench

Anita vs Minakshi Sundaram & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 27 October 2021 · Citation: (2021) 10 UK CK 0162

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 66 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 96 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Writ Court had directed the respondents to pay salary to the petitioner w.e.f. 21.05.2013.

2.

Alleging willful disobedience of the said order, this contempt petition has been filed.

3.

In paragraph no. 6 of the compliance affidavit filed by Mr. Madan Singh Rawat, Chief Education Officer, District Pauri Garhwal, it has been stated that salary has been paid to the petitioner from the due date.

4.

In view of the statement so made in the compliance affidavit, the contempt petition is closed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are herby discharged.