AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 384 wordsPetitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.437 dated
15.07.2017, registered at Police Station City Sonepat, District Sonepat, under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Notice of motion has been issued. Learned State counsel has appeared on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and gone through the record.
From the record, I find that FIR regarding death of Pinki wife of Sunil has been got registered against unknown persons. During the investigation, it
was found that Sunil, husband of Pinki has killed his wife with the help of the present petitioner. The present petitioner has been nominated on the
disclosure statement of main accused-Sunil and attribution to him (present petitioner) is that he caught hold of the legs of the deceased. No injury has
been attributed to him. He has no motive to kill the wife of main accused.
Learned State counsel submits that the present petitioner agreed to help the main accused for Rs.40,000/-, out of which an amount of Rs.20,000/- has
already been received by him from main accused-Sunil.
Perusal of record shows that main accused is Sunil, who has killed his wife in his house. The present petitioner is not the main accused and he has
been named by the co-accused. Moreover, brother and father of the deceased, who had already been examined, have not supported the prosecution
version during their cross-examinations.
The petitioner has been in custody since 23.07.2017. He is not required for any investigation or interrogation purposes as he is in judicial custody. The
trial of case may take a long time. No useful purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner in custody till the final disposal of the case.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts in minute detail and without expressing any opinion on
the merits of the case, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing
personal bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
