High CourtsSingle Bench

Jashobanta Mohanty @ Brahma vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 12 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 OHC CK 0079

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K. Pattanaik, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 394
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 9501 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 473 words

R.K.Pattanaik, J

1.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

3.

This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the petitioner in connection with Bolangir Town P.S. Case No. 420 of 2021

corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1108 of 2021 registered under Section 394 IPC pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bolangir on the grounds

stated therein.

4.

Perused the F.I.R. i.e. Anneuxre-1 and impugned order dated 23.09.2021 as at Annexure-2.

5.

Gone through the contents of the F.I.R.

6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that another accused has been granted bail by the learned court below on 03.01.2022 and

the present accused is on similar footing and that apart, when the occurrence took place, all the accused persons including the informant had gathered

for an occasion and considering the materials on record and that in the meantime, charge sheet has been filed on 13.12.2021, the petitioner should be

released on bail with any conditions which is objected to by the learned counsel for the State on the ground that the accused is having a dozen of

criminal cases to his credit.

7.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is in judicial custody since 07.09.2021 and submitted that one of the accused persons has been

granted bail by the learned court below. It is claimed that no recovery has been made from the petitioner. It is also submitted that the informant is also

having similar criminal track record. No doubt, the petitioner is alleged of having criminal antecedent, but then, having regard to the fact that the

charge sheet has been filed and another accused has been granted bail by the learned court below, the Court is of the humble opinion that by

extending parity, the present accused should also be released on bail and accordingly, it is ordered.

8.

In the result, it is directed that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(rupees twenty five thousand) with one

solvent surety for the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below, who shall impose such other terms and conditions, as deemed

just and proper, in the facts and circumstances of the case.

9.

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

10.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order

available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798, dated 15th April, 2021, and Court’s Office

Order circulated vide Memo Nos. 5143 and 515 dated 7th January, 2022.

..............................................