High CourtsSingle Bench

Niranjan Dehury And Others vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 25 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 OHC CK 0184

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. P. Routray, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 120B, 302
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 9817 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 312 words

B. P. Routray, J

1.

This matter is taken up through video conferencing.

2.

This is an application under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. for bail and the offences alleged are under Secs.302/120-B/34, I.P.C.

3.

Heard Mr. A. Dash, learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as Mr. M.K. Mohanty, learned A.S.C. for the State-Opposite Party.

4.

It is submitted that the Petitioner is inside custody since 4.7.2020 and in the meantime three other co-accused persons, namely, Golak Bihari Jena,

Dillip Jena and Rabi Singh have been released on bail. It is further submitted that neither any eye-witness to the occurrence is there nor circumstance

is found to suggest implication of the Petitioners in the offences.

5.

After hearing learned A.S.C. for the State-Opposite Party and considering the statement of the different witnesses as well as circumstances of the

case, it is directed to release the Petitioners on bail in connection with Badasahi P.S. Case No.84/2020 corresponding to S.T. No.196/2021 on such

terms and conditions to be fixed by the learned 2nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Baripada, Mayurbhanj or the court in seisin over the matter as he deems just

and proper including the condition that the Petitioners shall not dissuade any witness directly or indirectly by way of inducement, threat or promise

acquainted with the facts of the case from disclosing such facts before the court or tamper with the evidence.

6.

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

7.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order

available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021 and Court’s Office

Order circulated vide Memo No.514, dated 7th January, 2022.

..............................................