High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 10 UK CK 0197

Jeevan Chandra Pandey vs State Of U.P. & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 28 October 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 535 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 271 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 1 State of U.P. to grant and release the arrear of family pension of late Panuli Devi widow of freedom fighter, from the date of her application till the bifurcation of State of U.P.

(ii) Alternately, a direction may be issued to respondent no. 1 to 2, in the nature of mandamus to pay the arrears of family pension to petitioner's family from the date when it was applied, ie.f. from the year 1980.

2.

Mr. Gopal K. Verma, learned Additional C.S.C. appearing for the State of U.P., on instructions, submits that the file, relating to grandmother of the petitioner, was transferred by State of U.P., upon reorganisation, to the State of Uttarakhand on 25.04.2001. He further submits that State of U.P. had requested to State of Uttarakhand to send back the record in respect of petitioner's grandmother so that petitioner's claim for family pension may be examined.

3.

In view of the statement so made by learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of U.P., the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2 to send back certified copy of File No. 273/80 in respect of petitioner's grandmother regarding grant of family pension, to State of U.P., within four weeks. The Competent Authority in the State of U.P. shall consider petitioner's claim for grant of family pension available to dependants of freedom fighter and pass appropriate order, in accordance with law, within six weeks thereafter.