High CourtsSingle Bench

Jowherunnisa vs State Of Karnataka & Others

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 1 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 KAR CK 0072

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. M. Shyam Prasad, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 8252 Of 2010 (KLR/RES)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 208 words

B. M. Shyam Prasad, J

1.

Sri. A.R. Srinivas, learned Additional Government Advocate, submits that the present petition is filed essentially impugning the vires of Sections

79A, 79B and 80 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, [for short 'Land Reforms Act'], but with the enactment of Karnataka Land Reforms

[Amendment] Act, 2020, the petition is rendered infructuous.

2.

The petitioner, apart from impugning the aforesaid provisions of the Land Reforms Act, has also impugned the order dated 2.3.2009 in

LRF:SR[NE]170/2007-08, an order passed by the third respondent for forfeiting the land in Sy. No.96/1 measuring 1 acre 23 guntas of Basavanahalli

Village, Kasaba Hobli, Nelamangala Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru for violation of the provisions of Sections 79A and 79B of the Land

Reforms Act. This Court on 6.8.2010, has restrained the respondent from taking further action pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 2.3.2009.

3.

In view of the omission of Sections 79A, 79B, 79C and 80 of the Land Reforms Act by the Karnataka Land Reforms [Amendment] Act, 2020 and

also the provisions of Section 12 of the Karnataka Land Reforms [Amendment] Act, 2020, as regards abatement of pending proceedings, the petition

in its entirety is rendered completely infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.