High CourtsSingle Bench

Kailash Nath vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 6 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 UK CK 0017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2606 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 216 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner took a loan from Almora Zila Sahkari Bank, Branch Garur, District Bageshwar. Since he defaulted in repayment of the loan, therefore,

proceedings for recovery have been initiated against him.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the recovery citation issued by Tehsildar Garur for recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,91,340/- plus

other charges.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to repay the entire outstanding amount; but, he prays that some

reasonable time be given to the petitioner for the purpose.

4.

Mr. Jayvardhan Kandpal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 has no objection if reasonable time is given to the petitioner for repayment

of the amount of loan.

5.

Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

I. Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 25,000/- with the concerned Bank within three weeks from today.

II. The remaining amount shall be deposited by the petitioner in instalments, spreading over a period of nine months, to be fixed by the bank.

III. In case of default in fulfilment of the aforesaid conditions, petitioner shall not be entitled of any benefit of this order and the respondent-bank is

free to proceed against the petitioner, in accordance with law.