High CourtsDivision Bench

Kameshwar Dutt Misra vs Rex.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 17 February 1949 · Citation: AIR 1949 All 586 : (1949) CriLJ 894

HON’BLE JUDGES
Malik, C.J · Bhargava, J
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 207 words

Malik, C.J.—We have heard learned Counsel for be to parties. It is not necessary to treat this as a criminal revision and give any decision on the point. The learned Magistrate had convicted certain accused. The learned Sessions Judge allowed the appeal, In his judgment the learned Sessions Judge made the following remarks about the trying Magistrate

It leaves a bad impression upon my mind, on going, through the evidence and the circumstances of the case, about the capacity of the Honorary Magistrate. He appears to be at pains to record a finding of guilty against the appellant.

It is desirable t, hat superior Courts, when delivering judgment, should always use restrained language about inferior Courts so that confidence of the public in the administration of justice might not be shaken. After these remarks so publicly made the learned Magistrate could not inspire any confidence in the minds of the litigant public. If the learned Sessions Judge was of the opinion that the Magistrate was unfit he could have written a separate note and sent it to the authorities concerned. We cannot too strongly deprecate the use of such intemperate language in any judgment which is a public pronouncement and is available to the public at large.