AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 128 wordsAhanthem Bimol Singh, J
Mr. Th. Mahira, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and Mr. N. Surendrajit, learned counsel appeared on behalf of respondent No. 1. None appeared on behalf of respondent No. 3, despite service of notice.
It has been submitted by Mr. N. Surendrajit, learned counsel that during the pendency of this appeal, the respondent No. 2 has expired and except for the respondent No. 1, there is no other legal heir of the deceased respondent No. 2.
Mr. Th. Mahira, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that preparation of the paper book has already been completed and the matter can be finally heard.
As prayed for by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, list this case for final hearing on 12-05-2026.
