High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 04 KAR CK 0057

KHADAR PASHA S/O PACHA SAAB Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 12 April 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rathnakala
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
931 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

42 paragraphs · 419 words
1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned High Court Government Pleader for the

respondent-State.

2.

The petitioner is charge sheeted by the respondent

Police in respect of the Crime No.95/2014 for the offences

punishable under Sections 498A, 302, 304B r/w 34 of IPC

and Section 3, 4 of D.P. Act.

3.

The allegation is, petitioner was married to

deceased Nagina eight months prior to the incident.

During the marriage, he has received dowry in cash to

kind. Two months after the marriage, he started harassing

the deceased by demanding Rs.20,000/- from her parental

home. He necked her out of the matrimonial home and the

deceased was residing with her parents. On the morning

of 04.10.2014, he persuaded the deceased to go with him

to purchase cloth for the festival. He took her in a

motorcycle bearing registration No.KA-53-K-0991 to Bagur

village near the Eucalyptus plantation strangulated her

with a veil and Nakab and also pressed her mouth and

committed murder of her between 7 to 9 a.m.

4.

Perused the charge sheet papers. The

complainant/father of the deceased has stated that while

he was working in the shop at 9.00 p.m., he received a

phone call from the brother of the accused informing that

his daughter Nagina is murdered by her husband and

thereafter he along with his family members traced the

dead body in a Eucalyptus plantation.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

the statement of brother of the deceased is not recorded by

the Investigating Officer. The recovery mahazar is

concocted to suit his prosecution case.

6.

Having regard to the fact that the case of the

prosecution strongly rests on the circumstantial evidence

which is yet to be established during trial, there is no

impediment to allow the petition.

5.

Accordingly, petition is allowed. The petitioner

is enlarged on bail in Crime No.95/2014 registered by the

respondent-police, subject to following conditions:

i) The petitioner is enlarged on bail by executing a self bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court.

ii) The sureties shall produce original title deeds pertaining to their properties and also their original identity cards/Adhaar Cards to the Court for perusal and they shall not have the previous history of offering surety to the accused persons of any other criminal cases.

iii) He shall attend the Court on all hearing dates regularly and punctually;

iv) He shall not threaten or prevail upon the prosecution witnesses.