High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 04 KAR CK 0045

PETER MESSEE @ ROHITH MESSEE vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 7 April 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rathnakala
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
525 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

43 paragraphs · 412 words
1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned High Court Government Pleader for the

respondent-State.

The respondent-police have charge-sheeted the

petitioner (accused No.1) and six others in their Crime

No.338/2013 in respect of offences punishable under

Sections 364(a), 302, 201, 118 r/w Section 149 of IPC.

2.

The prosecution case is, in pursuance of

conspiracy between accused Nos.1 and 2, they took a

room on rent in the building belonging to CW2 and paid

advance amount of Rs.2,000/- on 17.11.2013. Accused

No.3 was made to wait in the said room for the victim.

Accused No.1 persuaded the deceased to come with him

to the room and traveled with him in the TVS Scooty

Streak vehicle as a pillion rider. The deceased was

taken into the room and demanded for ransom. Since

the deceased refused, he was strangulated with cable

wires and done to death. Thereafter, they disappeared

with the scooty of the deceased leaving behind the dead

body in a plastic bag in the room. The offence came to

light only on 21.11.2013.

3.

The scooty on which the deceased had

traveled is seized from the possession of accused No.2

and he is enlarged on bail by the order of this Court in

Crl.P.No.2209/2016 and connected case. The case of

the prosecution rests on the circumstantial evidence.

The security guard of the building is said to have last

seen the deceased on the evening of 19.11.2013 at 4.00

p.m. while he came near the building. No other

incriminating material is seized from the possession of

the petitioner. As per the submission at bar, so far

charge is not framed since the matter is stayed in the

revision petition filed by the co-accused before this

Court.

4.

In the above circumstances, there is no

impediment to allow the petition.

5.

Accordingly, petition is allowed. The

petitioner is enlarged on bail in Crime No.338/2013

registered by the respondent-Police, subject to following

conditions:

(i) He shall execute a self bond for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two local sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court. The sureties shall produce their Aadhar Card/Identity Card and the original title deed pertaining to their immovable property for perusal of the Court. The sureties shall not have the history of offering surety to the accused persons of any other criminal case.

(ii) He shall attend the Court on all hearing dates regularly and punctually;

(iii) He shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses;