High CourtsSingle Bench

Sumba Sherpa vs Union Of India & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 6 June 2024 · Citation: (2024) 06 SIK CK 0068

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 52 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 101 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned Senior Counsel for the respondent no.2 submits that the counter affidavit has been filed but is in defect and would be cured during the course of the day. Permitted.

2.

The learned Government Advocate for the respondent nos. 3 to 6 submits that the counter affidavit is ready but he is yet to obtain the signature of the concerned officer who was busy in the election process. One week’s time as prayed for is granted to do the same. Two weeks thereafter, to the petitioners to file rejoinder if any.

3.

List on 10.07.2024.