High CourtsSingle Bench

Krishna Gupta & Anr vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 10 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 DEL CK 0149

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 420
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 4040 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 362 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

Crl. M.A. 29757/2018 (Exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

1.

The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.33/2018 under Sections 420/120B IPC, Police Station Preet Vihar.

2.

The subject FIR was registered consequent to a dispute which arose between the parties with regard to the sale of a property. The complainant had

agreed to purchase the property of the petitioners, for which an advance of Rs.30 lakhs was paid. Subsequently, as disputes arose, the sale could not

go through.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the disputes between the parties have been settled. The parties have entered into a settlement

before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts on 07.07.2018. As per the settlement, the petitioners have agreed to return the said amount

of Rs.30,00,000/- in full and final settlement of all claims of the respondent No.2.

4.

The respondent No.2 is present in person, represented by counsel and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled her

disputes with the petitioners and has received the said amount of Rs.30,00,000 and on receipt of the said amount of Rs.30,00,000/-, all her claims, title

and interest with respect to the subject property have also extinguished and she has no claim surviving against the said property. She further submits

that she does not wish to press the complaint against the petitioners any further and has no objection in case the subject FIR is quashed.

5.

In view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent No. 2 does not wish to press her complaint, continuation of criminal

proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored;

securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings

emanating therefrom.

6.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.33/2018 under Sections 420/120B IPC, Police Station Preet Vihar and the consequent

proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

7.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.