High CourtsSingle Bench

Shanno Devi & Anr vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 8 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0131

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 420A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous CaseNo.5127 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 391 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Crl.M.A.33742/2018 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 5127/2018

1.

The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 366/2017, under Sections 420A/34 IPC, Police Station Burari, based on a settlement. Â

2.

Subject FIR emanates out of a dispute with regard to sale transaction of a property. Petitioners had agreed to sell a property to the complainant and

complainant had paid sale consideration of Rs. 14 lakhs. Subsequent there was allegation that there was defective title of the petitioner and subject

FIR was registered.

3.

Parties have subsequently settled their dispute and settlement agreement dated 15.02.2018 has been executed.

4.

Parties have settled their dispute and petitioners have agreed to pay a total sum of Rs. 15,25,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Lakhs and Fifteen Thousand

Only) in full and final settlement of all claims to the respondent. A sum of Rs. 10 lakhs has already been paid. Balance amount of Rs. 5,25,000/- has

been paid by way of the following demand drafts:

1.

DD No. 926376 dated 26.09.2018 drawn on Union Bank of India for Rs. 2 lakh;

2.

DD No. 926377 dated 26.09.2018 drawn on Union Bank of India for Rs. 2 lakh;

3.

DD No. 926378 dated 26.09.2018 drawn on Union Bank of India for Rs. 1 lakh and Rs. 25000/-.

5.

Respondent no. 2 is present in court in person, represented by counsel and identified by Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled her

dispute with the petitioners and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further against the petitioners and has no objection to the quashing of the

subject FIR.

6.

In view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent No. 2 does not wish to press her complaint, continuation of criminal

proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored;

securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings

emanating therefrom.

7.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 366/2017, under Sections 420A/34 IPC, Police Station Burari, and the consequent proceedings

emanating there from are accordingly quashed.

8.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. Â