High CourtsSingle Bench

Kunti Kumari vs State Of H.P. & Ors

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 18 September 2023 · Citation: (2023) 09 SHI CK 0044

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 6595 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 398 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

1.

Notice. Mr. Sumit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage.

3.

The petitioner is serving as Female Health Worker. Her grievance is to the office order dated 31.08.2023, which transfers her from CHC Sangla District Kinnaur to PHC Baragaon, District Shimla, H.P. against vacancy on administrative grounds.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had joined her present place of posting, a tribal/hard area in July 2021. She has just completed about two years there. The petitioner has not completed her normal tenure at the present place of posting. It was further submitted that the petitioner is due for retirement on 31. 05.2025 and thus, she is left with one year and nine months to superannuate. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondents did not even comply with Clause 16 of the Transfer Policy that mandates giving options to the incumbent posted at tribal areas for their transfers/adjustments.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner shall be content in case she is permitted to represent to respondent No.2 /competent authority

for allowing her to continue at the present place of posting in view of her impending retirement or in the alternative, for adjustment to a place of her choice as per of Clause 16 of the Transfer Policy, also keeping in view Clause 5.4 of the Transfer Policy taking into consideration that her husband Sh. Subhash Chander, petitioner in CWP No.6597 of 2023 is also working as Health Educator in the respondent Health Department, whereafter competent authority be directed to decide the same within a fixed time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer.

6.

In view of the above submissions, this writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make a representation to respondent No.2/competent authority within two weeks from today, which shall be considered and decided by respondent No.2/competent authority in accordance with law and applicable policy, within a period of two weeks thereafter. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. Till such time, operation of impugned transfer order dated 31.08.2023 (Annexure P-1) shall remain stayed.

Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of.