High CourtsDivision Bench

Sumati Sharma vs State Of H.P. & Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 2 September 2020 · Citation: (2020) 09 SHI CK 0087

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narayana Swamy, CJ · Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 3368 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 202 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

1.

The petitioner, who is working as Medical Officer, Gemur, Primary Health Centre (PHC), District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P., w.e.f. 17.06.2016, has come up before this Court seeking her transfer from a tribal area to one of the stations of her choice, as per clause 16.1 of the Comprehensive Guiding Principles-2013, of the transfer policy applicable in the State of Himachal Pradesh, which provides that the normal tenure of stay of posting in Most Difficult/Difficult/ Tribal/and the Hard areas shall be two winters and three summers.

2.

Notice. Mr. Adarsh Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

3.

In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents.

4.

Consequently, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make fresh representation to the first respondent, mentioning therein the stations of her choice, within one week, in accordance with the transfer policy. On receipt of such representation, the said respondent shall consider the same, in the light of the transfer policy occupying the field, and pass appropriate orders, within two weeks. Pending application(s), if any, are closed.

Copy Dasti.