High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 11 MAD CK 0047

L. Chidambaram Chettiar vs The Sub Collector, The Tahsildar and The District Revenue Office

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 November 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (MD) No. 13768 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 246 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard Mr. VR. Shanmuganathan, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. R. Manoharan, the learned

Government Advocate appearing for the Respondents.

2.

By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal.

3.

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if

the third Respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the Petitioner, dated 05.04.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a

specified period.

4.

The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

5.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsels appearing on either side, the third Respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal

filed by the Petitioner, dated 05.04.2010, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, as well as to the other persons concerned, on

merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner is directed to

furnish a copy of the appeal, dated 05.04.2010, to the third Respondent, along with a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that this Court,

by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.