High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 03 RAJ CK 0115

Laxman Panwar S/O Late Shri. Poosaram vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 30 March 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
CASE NUMBER
2738 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 243 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

2.

The instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has

been preferred on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in

connection with F.I.R. No.402/2014, registered at CPS, ACB,

Jaipur for the offences under Section 13(1)D, 13(2) of the P.C. Act

and Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC.

3.

The petitioner was subjected to disciplinary enquiry under

Rule 16 of the CCA Rules in relation to almost identical allegations

which have been set out in the FIR and he has been exonerated

therein. The petitioner is a public servant and is in judicial

custody. Investigation and trial are likely to consume time.

4.

In this background and having regard to the facts and

circumstances available on record but without expressing any

opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that

the petitioner deserves to be released on bail.

5.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Laxman Panwar

arrested in connection with the F.I.R. No.402/2014, registered at

CPS, ACB, Jaipur shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a

personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the

stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and

as and when called upon to do so.