AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 226 wordsManoj K. Tiwari, J
Writ petition (M/S) No. 1057 of 2019 filed by the petitioner was disposed of with a direction to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khatima, District
Udham Singh Nagar to decide petitioner’s representation within sixty days.
In this contempt petition, petitioner contends that although Sub-Divisional Magistrate has passed an order on 03.07.2019, wherein it has been
provided that petitioner may be given some alternative land, however, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, Sub-Divisional Magistrate
concerned has forwarded the matter to District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and the District Magistrate in turn referred the matter to the State
Government and the matter is now pending before the State Government.
Since the direction issued by Writ Court was only to Sub-Divisional Magistrate concerned and not to Secretary, Revenue, therefore, Secretary
cannot be proceded against under provision of Contempt of Courts Act.
In such view of the matter, contempt notice cannot be issued to the opposite parties. However, having regard to the facts of the case, contempt
petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Secretary, Revenue, Uttarakhand by making a representation within two weeks from
today. If such a representation is made within stipulated time, decision thereupon shall be taken as early as possible, preferably within three months
from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
