High CourtsSingle Bench

Malkiat Kaur @ Keepo vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0334

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Mohan Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 21, 22 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 25
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 26812 Of 2019(O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 418 words

Raj Mohan Singh, J

The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in her second attempt under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.144 dated 21.10.2018, registered under

Sections 21 & 22 of the NDPS Act and Section 25 of the Arms Act at Police Station Kot Ise Khan, District Moga.

Petitioner along with her son was arrested in the aforesaid case when their car was stopped by the Police party. Petitioner was sitting next to her son

in the car. Personal search of Satnam Singh @ Nishan Singh resulted in one 32 bore country-made pistol with two live cartridges. Search of the

petitioner resulted in recovery of 8 grams of heroin and 250 grams of intoxicant power besides recovery of currency notes of Rs.4,000/- in her

personal search. As per FSL report, the intoxicant power was found to be Alprazolam.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Satnam Singh @ Nishan Singh has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated

04.04.2019 passed in CRM-M No.61733 of 2018. In the fard recovery Heroin and intoxicant powder and Farad recovery memo of Rs.4,000/-, FIR

number has been recorded at the top of the documents which shows that the documents have been manipulated at some convenient place and the

same have been prepared only after registration of the case and not at the spot, when the petitioner was apprehended.

Petitioner is a lady and is in custody since 25.10.2018. Petitioner was granted indulgence by this Court for interim bail vide order dated 19.11.2020 for

a period of two weeks in order to attend Bhog ceremony of her husband. She has surrendered thereafter.

On 16.12.2020, learned State counsel sought time to file latest custody certificate of the petitioner. Though the petitioner is shown to have been

involved in other NDPS cases, but she is on bail. The complicity of the petitioner would remain debatable.

At this stage, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the period for which the petitioner remained in custody and due to the situation

arising out of COVID-19 pandemic, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail.

In view of above, petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to her furnishing adequate bail bonds/surety bonds to the

satisfaction of the trial Court/concerned Duty Magistrate.

Nothing expressed hereinabove would be construed to be an expression of any opinion on merits of the case.