Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Malti (Pension Claimant) vs Gyanesh Bharti & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 29 October 2020 · Citation: (2020) 10 CAT CK 0170

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Mohd. Jamshed, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 161 Of 2020 In Original Application No. 3115 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 143 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

The applicant filed OA No.3115/2019 seeking the relief of family pension. The OA was disposed of on 21.10.2019 directing that the respondents

shall pass order on the representation of the applicant dated 10.08.2019.

2.

This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondents did not comply with the order of the Tribunal.

3.

Heard Shri M.K. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.

4.

It is brought to our notice that the respondents have released family pension to the applicant. She has got the relief much more than what was

granted in the OA.

5.

The contempt case is accordingly closed. In case the applicant has any grievance as to the quantum of pension, that is certainly a matter of

separate proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs.